existentialist hermeneutics

an interpretation could opt for :

sharing three seconds surrounded by nothing 

but the depth of a mirror which reflects nothing

but an ocean in the profundity of which scintillates nothing

but the light of a stellar gaze which attests nothing

but a dazzling call for the eyes which demand nothing

but to remain under the heavy waters which carry nothing

but a swell of hasty desire to be drawn into us.

a sour one would assert : 

sharing three seconds might evoke nothing

but a silent presence that mean nothing

but a tasty pride that results of nothing 

but a recognition of a stare awed by nothing

but the experience of stupefaction in the sight of nothing

but a distant portrait pretending to be nothing 

but a brief brave brain fart. 

a conjunction of the two would note that : 

sharing three seconds suspended in time is nothing

but the effect of the apprehension of nothing 

but an evident endearing statement of nothing 

but a candid desire which shows nothing 

but a peculiar wish to endure the risk of nothing 

but to seem filmically dreamery on behalf of nothing 

but a pursuit of the call of the moment 

nonetheless, a truth seeking interpretation would submit that : 

sharing three seconds occurs along with nothing 

but a concentrated conjecture of assumptions filled with nothing

but a weighty absence of communication leading to nothing 

but a speculation on motifs of an action which reflects onto nothing

but a misfortunate poetry driven by the very will of doing nothing 

but to fallow the call of the moment which wanders through nothing 

but an incitement to invention of itself.

you could as well chose not to interprete 

but the magnitude of three seconds in a life time scales much more than nothing 

whether or not there is a but and if it deserves an interpretation or not 

lets just create ourselves into the time and be alone together?